ALDEN - Governor Joshua Adamson and Former State Representative Joseph Cooke faced off for the final time before election day. The debate was nothing but heated, and voters who say they aren't sure who they want said they have made up their minds.
Polls conducted after the debate, showed that Joshua Adamson had a very heavy lead against Joseph Cooke. The topics of discussion included Abortion, Judicial and Election reform as well as Pay Equity. Both Cooke and Adamson laid out their plans for the state, at times arguing with each other.
On abortion, Cooke and Adamson both agreed that women should have a choice. Adamson however, said that their should be a limit to how long a women can go until an abortion becomes felony murder.
"Abortion is a fundamental right of women and that should not be regulated by men or any person for that matter," said Joseph Cooke. "Women who are victims of rape, incest should have access to the abortion, while women who simply don't have the means to care for the child. should be able to make the conscience decision to abort their child to prevent unintended impacts of adoption."
Joshua Adamson agreed to the incest and rape exception but differed his opinion to those who "simply don't want the child." He went on to explain that giving up a child for adoption isn't "a bad or mentally harmful."
"I think that the only exceptions that should be considered for abortion are rape, incest and the to protect the mother from death or other health complications," said Joshua Adamson. "If you choose to have unprotected sex and the result of that consensual sex is another human being, it should be considered murder to abort that person. If you can't afford that child, give it up for adoption so that someone can take care of the baby, and give it a life it deserves."
On the topic of Judicial reform, Adamson held a stronger position than Joseph Cooke, who struggled to deliver a strong plan to reform the Justice System in Mesa.
"My plan to reform our justice is rooted in our support of law enforcement, love of country, and peace of law and order," said Joshua Adamson. "We must support our law enforcement. The liberalization of the state's government back in 1999, made it harder for Law Enforcement to do their jobs. We plan on granting them more protections while serving, ethically and honestly, the people of our state. I have and will always support law enforcement."
Joseph Cooke expressed the need for more law enforcement overwatch, while promoting spending growth for law enforcement programs. He drew strong criticism for Pro-Law Enforcement Nationalists who said that "with out Law Enforcement, there is no law and order. We need police and advocacy groups will agree as well."
"We need to have more overwatch for LEO, because unchecked power, brings unchecked abuses and unchecked rights violations," said Cooke. "We need to ensure that our streets remain safe, but we need to also ensure that law enforcement don't have unlimited power."
Both candidates then briefly touched on election reform, in the wake of growing concern that the 2024 US presidential election will be stolen, Mesa's voters too are concerned about the integrity of elections in the country but more specifically in Mesa, as they seek to be elected Governor on October 18.
"We must safeguard all elections by introducing policy that seeks to govern the way election boards across the state operate, and ensure they are operating consistent with existing state election laws," said Joshua Adamson. "What happens in communist and dictator-led countries, could happen here if it isn't kept in check and the legal processes that protect citizen votes are completely ripped away."
Cooke responded with a sloppy response to that notion. He explained that votes are secured and will continue to be.
"We really need to focus on the LBGTQ community's rights than the electoral system in our state," said Cooke. "Votes are already secured and will continue to be. There is no need to worry about that. There are bigger issues at hand."
Finally, both candidates discussed pay equality, but many viewers say both candidates fell short of their target when they gave their responses. Both candidates told the moderators that pay equality is important, but neve gave key examples of what they would do to ensure pay equity.
The debate concluded in chaos as both candidates argued that each other's policies would be harmful to each other and called out each other's lack of empathy of key policy and human rights.